Natex, Liverpool

Natex, Liverpool

External Cladding package for Liverpool Towers 9 and 15 Storeys

SCF became involved with Natex when tendering the works for Barton PM working on behalf of The Mount Property Group as part of a cost savings exercise, driving the project product specifications to meet cost plan based on performance specification requirements. 

Our initial works involved preparing a cost plan on the basis of a number of different options, essentially preparing a shopping list of elements to permit the Client and Design Team to select the relative components to achieve the performance specification in terms of thermal/acoustic and fire performance while remaining within budget.
3D Model Images from Mount Property Group

Roofing, Cladding, Window and Curtain Wall Supply and Installation

Client: Mount Property Group

Architect: FCH Architects

Fire Engineer: BB7 (Omega Fire Engineering Limited)

Contractor: Barton PM

Project Value


Recladding Contract Value: Circa £4.5m

Mast Climbers

Building Height: 47m


Access Considerations include the proximity of the building to a number of adjacent buildings as well as the main arterial traffic route of Norton Street.


Access Strategy:

- Full Perimeter Mast Climbers

Implications of 3D Geometric Triangles on Fire Stopping

SCF firstly reviewed this project in line with Cost Plan Budget Constraints and reviewed the Cladding Options available to meet the performance specifications provided for the building. This allowed us to look at alternative aesthetic options for the building which would still achieve the thermal, acoustic and fire performance of the building. The first significant challenge as we saw it was the incorporation of the 3D Geometric Panels to the Gable Elevations on both towers. The Panels were intimated as GRC (Glass Reinforced  Concrete) however this is bulky, weight prohibitive and incredibly expensive. The profile of the 'diamond' shapes meant that the horizontal fire stopping at slab levels would be required to undulate to take up the triangular shapes and would also be rake cut. Fire Stopping and Cavity Barriers of this form are untested. From the very initial stages this was clearly not a viable option for the building. 


Our next review was Aluminium Cladding Panels, reviewing A2 ACM and A1/A2 Aluminium Panels which could either be bent or routered to form the profiles required. It is feasible to form the shapes in this manner, however we still meet the same issues surrounding fire stopping and cavity barriers. The voids are great and significantly varying making it unfeasible to proceed with panels of these profiles without significant expense in terms of large scale fire tests to prove the reliability of the system.


Our final review was to simplify the elevations to flat tray panels, formed as triangles which could be painted to create the illusion of the projections forming the 'diamond' shapes. This allows us to create a uniform cavity to the rear of the panels, can be based on the design and detailing of tested systems in terms of the panels themselves and can incorporate standard cavity barriers and fire stopping.  In our view, this is the best, most efficient and most economical resolution to this complex design challenge, while maintaining the key thermal, acoustic and fire performance criteria of the building. 


Related Projects

Share by: